IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v38y2014i4p945-960..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare: a centenary assessment

Author

Listed:
  • David Collard

Abstract

Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare offered a programme of action that was potentially very interventionist. Any economic policy should be assessed, he proposed, by its expected effect on the size, distribution and variability of the national dividend. His programme, though rough and ready, has proved to be more useful than the ‘new’ welfare economics, which tended to leave distributional questions for others and ‘efficiency’ questions to competitive markets. Pigou himself, however, took a conservative view of what might be done in practice. The impact of policies on the size, distribution and variability of income is still a central focus of both popular and technical interest. Some of the issues now recognised as important to well-being, such as welfare in unequal societies and the experience of unemployment, may be subsumed into Pigou’s three criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • David Collard, 2014. "Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare: a centenary assessment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(4), pages 945-960.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:38:y:2014:i:4:p:945-960.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bet072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:38:y:2014:i:4:p:945-960.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.