IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v38y2014i3p623-641..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political economy and the social disciplines: the modern life of Das Adam Smith Problem

Author

Listed:
  • William Dixon
  • David Wilson

Abstract

The standard vision of the self in economics has been backdated onto a misrepresented Adam Smith but has more in common with the egoistic vision of Thomas Hobbes. This self, given its narrowness, has provoked criticism concerning its adequacy for explaining social, historical and psychological phenomena. The latter are then addressed within a framework that reproduces their Hobbesian origin by ceding a territory of self-interest, rational choice, to economics and so looks to disciplinary proliferation to cover the areas left aside. In this manner we shall show an anti-Whig history as much constrained by its origins as what it contests. Both sides have reproduced uncritically the framework of Das Adam Smith Problem. Here we investigate how developments of sociology, social history, socio-economics and economic psychology have not been able to exit from the terms of that problem.

Suggested Citation

  • William Dixon & David Wilson, 2014. "Political economy and the social disciplines: the modern life of Das Adam Smith Problem," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 623-641.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:38:y:2014:i:3:p:623-641.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:38:y:2014:i:3:p:623-641.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.