IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v37y2013i5p1019-1033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducing the social structure: a Marxist critique of Anthony Giddens's Structuration Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Brian O'Boyle

Abstract

Marxist criticism of Anthony Giddens's sociology tends to fall into one of two camps. On one side, numerous authors have criticised Giddens's methodological writings for their failure to properly elucidate the relationship between agency and structure. Giddens's refusal to accept a role for structural causation has been the primary concern in these methodological appraisals as the upshot is a conception of social relations without any efficacy. On the other side have been the numerous critiques of Giddens's purported renewal of social democracy. Here the criticism tends to focus on Giddens's shift to the political right, but it is rarely noticed that there is also a methodological critique waiting to be developed. Giddens's early work is nothing if not a celebration of the agent with structure demoted to little more than an epiphenomenon. The later writings are, in contrast, almost entirely built around the structural omnipotence of neo-liberal capitalism, and this paper sets out to elucidate the incongruence between these two positions. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian O'Boyle, 2013. "Reproducing the social structure: a Marxist critique of Anthony Giddens's Structuration Methodology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(5), pages 1019-1033.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:5:p:1019-1033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:5:p:1019-1033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.