IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v37y2013i1p91-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics and the family: a postcolonial perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Hewitson

Abstract

A postcolonial perspective in the history of economic thought reveals the ways in which racial theory was built into the foundations of neoclassical economics. Neoclassical economics emerged within the context of nineteenth-century European colonisation and this paper connects the material practices of colonisation in Australia to this emerging body of theory. In particular, the paper focuses on the Western breadwinner/dependent family ideal that was deeply embedded within economic visions of development, prosperity and progress. I argue that neoclassical economics naturalised and justified colonial practices that sought to impose the homogeneity of culture, desires and needs used to justify the displacement and subordination of the colonised Aborigines. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Hewitson, 2013. "Economics and the family: a postcolonial perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(1), pages 91-111.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:91-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todorova, Zdravka, 2014. "From Monetary Theory of Production to Culture-Nature Life Process:Feminist-Institutional Elaborations of Social Provisioning," MPRA Paper 54681, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Svenja Flechtner, 2021. "Dimensions of Poverty. Measurement, Epistemic Injustices and Social Activism," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 530-544, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:91-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.