The macroeconomic stabilisation effects of Social Security and 401(k) plans
This paper investigates how various retirement institutions impact the macroeconomy. We find that for every 1 percentage point increase in the output gap, net flows of various government programmes including Social Security decrease by 0.34 percentage points, while net flows of 401(k) plans increase by 0.05 percentage points. In levels, for every $1 increase in real gross domestic product, net flows from various government programmes shrink by 45 cents, whereas net flows from 401(k) plans increase by 4.6 cents. In other words, 401(k) plans reduce the automatic stabilisation impact of government programmes by 10%--15%. Moreover, we find that Social Security has a net negative effect on household consumption, while 401(k) retirement accounts work the opposite way. In fact the destabilising effect of 401(k) plans on consumption is twice as strong as the one attributed to Social Security.These results highlight a significant problem with 401(k) retirement plans and any retirement plan that is dependent on financial markets. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.
Volume (Year): 36 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.cje.oupjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:1:p:237-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.