IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v35y2011i4p685-704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Routes of money endogeneity: a heuristic comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Man-Seop Park

Abstract

The paper sets up an analytical framework that is based on simplified balance sheets of the banking, the non-banking private and the government sectors, in order to identify four primary routes through which money can be generated endogenously and to discuss their characteristics. These routes approximate, if not precisely correspond to, the post-Keynesian accommodationist and structuralist views, the New Keynesian credit view ('bank lending channel'), and a hybrid one, respectively. Copyright The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Man-Seop Park, 2011. "Routes of money endogeneity: a heuristic comparison," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(4), pages 685-704.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:35:y:2011:i:4:p:685-704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beq046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:35:y:2011:i:4:p:685-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.