IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v28y2004i2p273-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolutionary firm and Cournot's Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Neil B. Niman

Abstract

Recently, competence/capability has been introduced as a rival and as a complement to the idea of transaction-costs as the foundation for a modern theory of the firm. However, while the competence-based approach may be inspired by evolutionary economics, it does not, in its current form, provide an evolutionary theory of the firm. To transform this competence-based approach into an evolutionary theory, the connection between the firm and Veblen's concept of social knowledge is more fully developed. Once established, the evolutionary theory of the firm is utilised to bypass Marshall's reconciliation problem and solve Cournot's Dilemma. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil B. Niman, 2004. "The evolutionary firm and Cournot's Dilemma," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 28(2), pages 273-289, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:273-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niceto S. Poblador, 2011. "The Strategy Dilemma : Why Big Business Moves Seldom Pan Out as Planned," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 201105, University of the Philippines School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:273-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.