IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v26y2002i3p313-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences, reductionism and the microfoundations of Analytical Marxism

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Philp

Abstract

Analytical Marxism has recommended that Marxian theory should conform to 'normal' scientific methods and that this should involve the development of microfoundations. The latter has involved the adoption of rational choice theory and its corresponding assumptions regarding agents' behaviour. This paper seeks to question this position and highlight a number of problems which Analytical Marxism faces, particularly in the domain of economic theory. The different views of science espoused by Analytical Marxists display a tension between 'positivist' and 'realist' perspectives, and the arguments for individualist and anti-reductionist approaches to social and economic theory are also argued to be problematic. The approach of Analytical Marxism, it is suggested, can involve the uncritical adoption of many of the assumptions of standard economic theory and, as such, it is subject to a number of substantive criticisms, some of which have been elaborated from within mainstream economic theory. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Philp, 2002. "Preferences, reductionism and the microfoundations of Analytical Marxism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(3), pages 313-329, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:313-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:313-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.