IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v21y1997i2p127-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception and Measurement of Transaction Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Buckley, Peter J
  • Chapman, Malcolm

Abstract

This paper discusses various explanations of how transaction cost-minimizing corporate configurations come about. It contrasts Darwinian with rational explanations, finding both unsatisfactory. What matters, rather than computation of fully recognized transaction costs, are managerial perceptions of transaction costs. These perceptions are not expressed in numbers but in language. This is related to arguments derived from bounded rationality and from transaction cost economics. The paper argues that issues of managerial perception must become central to analysis. Existing academic traditions which accord primacy to perception and to language are drawn upon and argued to be of great relevance to future work. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Buckley, Peter J & Chapman, Malcolm, 1997. "The Perception and Measurement of Transaction Costs," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 21(2), pages 127-145, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:127-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:127-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.