IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v20y1996i3p277-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pigou, Clark and Modern Economics: The Quality of the Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Stabile, D R

Abstract

Pigou and Clark investigated the relationships between wages and the quality of the workforce with their common but distinctive concept of social costs. Pigou found cases in labour markets where improvements in workforce quality had external benefits that increased GNP. Clark saw the social costs of labour as the overhead costs society had to pay to keep its workforce intact, and using a dynamic institutional theory, argued that those costs should be placed directly on business in terms of a guaranteed living wage. It is argued that modern economics has neglected any connection between wages and social costs by treating them separately and propounding a trade-off between equity and efficiency. As a result, they analyse cutting programmes in terms of their impact on competitiveness, and neglect how they can result in an inferior workforce. (c) 1996 Academic Press Limited. Copyright 1996 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stabile, D R, 1996. "Pigou, Clark and Modern Economics: The Quality of the Workforce," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 277-288, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:277-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:277-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.