IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v97y2010i1p123-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharp bounds on causal effects in case-control and cohort studies

Author

Listed:
  • Manabu Kuroki
  • Zhihong Cai
  • Zhi Geng

Abstract

Evaluating the causal effect of an exposure on a response from case-control and cohort studies is a major concern in epidemiological and medical research. Since causal effects are in general nonidentifiable from such studies, this paper derives bounds on two causal measures: the causal risk difference and the causal risk ratio. We use the potential response approach and a linear programming method to derive sharp bounds on the causal risk difference, and a novel fractional programming method to derive bounds on the causal risk ratio. In addition, in the presence of missing data, we consider three different missingness mechanisms and propose sharp bounds under these situations. The results provide new guidance on causal inference in case-control and cohort studies. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Manabu Kuroki & Zhihong Cai & Zhi Geng, 2010. "Sharp bounds on causal effects in case-control and cohort studies," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(1), pages 123-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:97:y:2010:i:1:p:123-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asp076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:97:y:2010:i:1:p:123-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.