IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v95y2008i3p521-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal sampling and estimation strategies under the linear model

Author

Listed:
  • Desislava Nedyalkova
  • Yves Tillé

Abstract

In some cases model-based and model-assisted inferences can lead to very different estimators. These two paradigms are not so different if we search for an optimal strategy rather than just an optimal estimator, a strategy being a pair composed of a sampling design and an estimator. We show that, under a linear model, the optimal model-assisted strategy consists of a balanced sampling design with inclusion probabilities that are proportional to the standard deviations of the errors of the model and the Horvitz--Thompson estimator. If the heteroscedasticity of the model is ‚fully explainable’ by the auxiliary variables, then this strategy is also optimal in a model-based sense. Moreover, under balanced sampling and with inclusion probabilities that are proportional to the standard deviation of the model, the best linear unbiased estimator and the Horvitz--Thompson estimator are equal. Finally, it is possible to construct a single estimator for both the design and model variance. The inference can thus be valid under the sampling design and under the model. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Desislava Nedyalkova & Yves Tillé, 2008. "Optimal sampling and estimation strategies under the linear model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 521-537.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:95:y:2008:i:3:p:521-537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asn027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Alleva & G. Arbia & P. D. Falorsi & V. Nardelli & A. Zuliani, 2023. "Optimal two-stage spatial sampling design for estimating critical parameters of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: Efficiency versus feasibility," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 983-999, September.
    2. R. Benedetti & M. S. Andreano & F. Piersimoni, 2019. "Sample selection when a multivariate set of size measures is available," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(1), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Lin, X. Sheldon & Yang, Shuai, 2020. "Fast and efficient nested simulation for large variable annuity portfolios: A surrogate modeling approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 85-103.
    4. Alleva Giorgio & Petrarca Francesca & Falorsi Piero Demetrio & Righi Paolo, 2021. "Measuring the Accuracy of Aggregates Computed from a Statistical Register," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 481-503, June.
    5. Hasler, Caren & Tillé, Yves, 2014. "Fast balanced sampling for highly stratified population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 81-94.
    6. Vilma Nekrašaitė-Liegė, 2011. "Some applications of panel data models in small area estimation," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 12(2), pages 265-280, October.
    7. Ina Trolle Andersen & Ute Hahn & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2015. "Optimal PPS Sampling with Vanishing Auxiliary Variables – with Applications in Microscopy," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1136-1148, December.
    8. Donatien Tafin Djoko & Yves Till�, 2015. "Selection of balanced portfolios to track the main properties of a large market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 359-370, February.
    9. Alfio Marazzi & Yves Tillé, 2017. "Using past experience to optimize audit sampling design," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 435-462, August.
    10. Yves Tillé, 2022. "Some Solutions Inspired by Survey Sampling Theory to Build Effective Clinical Trials," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 481-498, December.
    11. Jessica Gronsbell & Molei Liu & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of prediction rules in semi‐supervised settings under stratified sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1353-1391, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:95:y:2008:i:3:p:521-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.