IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i4pasaf053..html

A more robust approach to multivariable Mendelian randomization

Author

Listed:
  • Yinxiang Wu
  • Hyunseung Kang
  • Ting Ye

Abstract

SummaryMultivariable Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer the direct effects of multiple exposures on an outcome. However, unlike univariable Mendelian randomization, multivariable Mendelian randomization often faces greater challenges with many weak instruments, which can lead to bias not necessarily toward zero and inflation of Type-I errors. In this work, we introduce a new asymptotic regime that allows exposures to have varying degrees of instrument strength, providing a more accurate theoretical framework for studying multivariable Mendelian randomization estimators. Under this regime, our analysis of the widely used multivariable inverse-variance-weighted method shows that it is often biased and tends to produce misleadingly narrow confidence intervals in the presence of many weak instruments. To address this, we propose a simple, closed-form modification to the multivariable inverse-variance-weighted estimator to reduce bias from weak instruments, and additionally introduce a novel spectral regularization technique to improve finite-sample performance. We show that the resulting spectral-regularized estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal under many weak instruments. Through simulations and real data applications, we demonstrate that our proposed estimator and asymptotic framework can enhance the robustness of multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinxiang Wu & Hyunseung Kang & Ting Ye, 2025. "A more robust approach to multivariable Mendelian randomization," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(4), pages 1-053..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:4:p:asaf053.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaf053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:4:p:asaf053.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.