IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i4pasaf036..html

Powerful partial conjunction hypothesis testing via conditioning

Author

Listed:
  • B Liang
  • L Zhang
  • L Janson

Abstract

SummaryA partial conjunction hypothesis test combines information across a set of base hypotheses to determine whether some subset is nonnull. Partial conjunction hypothesis tests arise in a diverse array of fields, but standard partial conjunction hypothesis testing methods can be highly conservative, leading to low power especially in low-signal settings commonly encountered in applications. In this paper, we introduce the conditional partial conjunction hypothesis test, a new method for testing a single partial conjunction hypothesis that directly corrects the conservativeness of standard approaches by conditioning on certain order statistics of the base -values. Under distributional assumptions commonly encountered in partial conjunction hypothesis testing, the proposed test is valid and produces nearly uniformly distributed -values under the null, i.e., the -values are only very slightly conservative. We demonstrate that our proposed test matches or outperforms existing single partial conjunction hypothesis tests with particular power gains in low-signal settings, maintains Type-I error control even under model misspecification and can be used to outperform state-of-the-art multiple partial conjunction hypothesis testing procedures in certain settings, particularly when side information is present. Finally, we illustrate an application of our proposed test through a replicability analysis across DNA microarray studies.

Suggested Citation

  • B Liang & L Zhang & L Janson, 2025. "Powerful partial conjunction hypothesis testing via conditioning," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(4), pages 1-036..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:4:p:asaf036.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaf036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:4:p:asaf036.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.