Author
Listed:
- Torben Martinussen
- Stijn Vansteelandt
Abstract
SummaryCox regression is the default approach to evaluating the (relative) effect of two treatments on a survival endpoint. This standard framework has nonetheless been criticized for its canonical effect measure, the hazard ratio, having a subtle interpretation, thereby hindering policy-making. This in turn has prompted interest in other effects measures, such as the difference in restricted mean survival time, the net benefit and the win ratio, which have become increasingly popular. Developments in estimation and inference for the net benefit and win ratio proceed either under a semiparametric model, at the risk of bias due to model misspecification, or in a nonparametric model, but without the flexibility to adjust for covariates. In this paper, we overcome these challenges by introducing a scalar, model-free measure of conditional causal net benefit in terms of counterfactuals and developing a debiased estimator based on its efficient influence function. This estimator is root- consistent and asymptotically model-free by flexibly enabling data-adaptive learning (e.g., machine learning) of the dependence of treatment, survival and censoring time on baseline covariates. By incorporating such covariates, the proposed estimators can improve the efficiency of randomized trial analyses, as well as correct for confounding and censoring bias in both randomized and observational studies. We also propose variations of the considered estimand (and estimator) that have a more favourable efficiency bound. The proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies and analysis of breast cancer data.
Suggested Citation
Torben Martinussen & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2025.
"Debiased learning of the causal net benefit with censored event time data,"
Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(3), pages 1-051..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:3:p:asaf051.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:3:p:asaf051.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.