IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i3pasaf049..html

Identifying and bounding the probability of necessity for causes of effects with ordinal outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Zhang
  • Zhi Geng
  • Wei Li
  • Peng Ding

Abstract

SummaryAlthough the existing causal inference literature focuses on the forward-looking perspective by estimating effects of causes, the backward-looking perspective can provide insights into causes of effects. In backward-looking causal inference, the probability of necessity measures the probability that a certain event is caused by the treatment, given the observed treatment and outcome. Most existing results focus on binary outcomes. Motivated by applications with ordinal outcomes, we propose a general definition of the probability of necessity. However, identifying the probability of necessity is challenging because it involves the joint distribution of the potential outcomes. We propose the novel assumption of a monotonic incremental treatment effect to identify the probability of necessity with ordinal outcomes. We also discuss the testable implications of this key identification assumption. When it fails, we derive explicit formulas of the sharp large-sample bounds on the probability of necessity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Zhang & Zhi Geng & Wei Li & Peng Ding, 2025. "Identifying and bounding the probability of necessity for causes of effects with ordinal outcomes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(3), pages 1-049..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:3:p:asaf049.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaf049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:3:p:asaf049.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.