IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i2p41-54..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sample distribution tests in high dimensions via max-sliced Wasserstein distance and bootstrapping

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Hu
  • Zhenhua Lin

Abstract

SummaryTwo-sample hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical problem for inference about two populations. In this paper, we construct a novel test statistic to detect high-dimensional distributional differences based on the max-sliced Wasserstein distance to mitigate the curse of dimensionality. By exploiting an intriguing link between the distance and suprema of empirical processes, we develop an effective bootstrapping procedure to approximate the null distribution of the test statistic. One distinctive feature of the proposed test is the ability to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for the max-sliced Wasserstein distances of projected distributions of interest. This enables, not only the detection of global distributional differences, but also the identification of significantly different marginal distributions between two populations, without the need for additional tests. We establish the convergence of Gaussian and bootstrap approximations of the proposed test, based on which we show that the test is asymptotically valid and powerful as long as the considered max-sliced Wasserstein distance is adequately large. The merits of our approach are illustrated via simulated and real data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Hu & Zhenhua Lin, 2025. "Two-sample distribution tests in high dimensions via max-sliced Wasserstein distance and bootstrapping," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(2), pages 41-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:41-54.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaf001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:41-54.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.