IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i2p2055-85..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-scale multiple testing of composite null hypotheses under heteroskedasticity

Author

Listed:
  • B Gang
  • T Banerjee

Abstract

SummaryHeteroskedasticity poses several methodological challenges in designing valid and powerful procedures for simultaneous testing of composite null hypotheses. In particular, the conventional practice of standardizing or rescaling heteroskedastic test statistics in this setting may severely affect the power of the underlying multiple testing procedure. Additionally, when the inferential parameter of interest is correlated with the variance of the test statistic, methods that ignore this dependence may fail to control the Type I error at the desired level. We propose a new heteroskedasticity-adjusted multiple testing procedure that avoids data reduction by standardization and directly incorporates the side information from the variances into the testing procedure. Our approach relies on an improved nonparametric empirical Bayes deconvolution estimator that offers a practical way of capturing the dependence between the inferential parameter of interest and the variance of the test statistic. We develop theory to establish that the proposed procedure is asymptotically valid and optimal for false discovery rate control. Simulation results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing procedures, with substantial power gains across many settings at the same false discovery rate level. The method is illustrated with an application involving the detection of engaged users on a mobile game app.

Suggested Citation

  • B Gang & T Banerjee, 2025. "Large-scale multiple testing of composite null hypotheses under heteroskedasticity," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(2), pages 2055-2085.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:2055-85.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:2055-85.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.