IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v111y2024i1p51-69..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient evaluation of natural stochastic policies in off-line reinforcement learning

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Kallus
  • Masatoshi Uehara

Abstract

SummaryWe study the efficient off-policy evaluation of natural stochastic policies, which are defined in terms of deviations from the unknown behaviour policy. This is a departure from the literature on off-policy evaluation that largely considers the evaluation of explicitly specified policies. Crucially, off-line reinforcement learning with natural stochastic policies can help alleviate issues of weak overlap, lead to policies that build upon current practice and improve policies’ implementability in practice. Compared with the classic case of a prespecified evaluation policy, when evaluating natural stochastic policies, the efficiency bound, which measures the best-achievable estimation error, is inflated since the evaluation policy itself is unknown. In this paper we derive the efficiency bounds of two major types of natural stochastic policies: tilting policies and modified treatment policies. We then propose efficient nonparametric estimators that attain the efficiency bounds under lax conditions and enjoy a partial double robustness property.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Kallus & Masatoshi Uehara, 2024. "Efficient evaluation of natural stochastic policies in off-line reinforcement learning," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(1), pages 51-69.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:1:p:51-69.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asad059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:1:p:51-69.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.