IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v110y2023i3p663-680..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions

Author

Listed:
  • Timo Dimitriadis
  • Lutz Dümbgen
  • Alexander Henzi
  • Marius Puke
  • Johanna Ziegel

Abstract

SummaryProbability predictions from binary regressions or machine learning methods ought to be calibrated: if an event is predicted to occur with probability , it should materialize with approximately that frequency, which means that the so-called calibration curveshould equal the identity, i.e.,for allin the unit interval. We propose honest calibration assessment based on novel confidence bands for the calibration curve, which are valid subject to only the natural assumption of isotonicity. Besides testing the classical goodness-of-fit null hypothesis of perfect calibration, our bands facilitate inverted goodness-of-fit tests whose rejection allows for the sought-after conclusion of a sufficiently well-specified model. We show that our bands have a finite-sample coverage guarantee, are narrower than those of existing approaches, and adapt to the local smoothness of the calibration curveand the local variance of the binary observations. In an application to modelling predictions of an infant having low birth weight, the bounds give informative insights into model calibration.

Suggested Citation

  • Timo Dimitriadis & Lutz Dümbgen & Alexander Henzi & Marius Puke & Johanna Ziegel, 2023. "Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(3), pages 663-680.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:663-680.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asac068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:663-680.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.