IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v109y2022i4p1067-1083..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance testing for canonical correlation analysis in high dimensions
[Inconsistency of the bootstrap when a parameter is on the boundary of the parameter space]

Author

Listed:
  • Ian W McKeague
  • Xin Zhang

Abstract

SummaryWe consider the problem of testing for the presence of linear relationships between large sets of random variables based on a postselection inference approach to canonical correlation analysis. The challenge is to adjust for the selection of subsets of variables having linear combinations with maximal sample correlation. To this end, we construct a stabilized one-step estimator of the Euclidean norm of the canonical correlations maximized over subsets of variables of prespecified cardinality. This estimator is shown to be consistent for its target parameter and asymptotically normal, provided the dimensions of the variables do not grow too quickly with sample size. We also develop a greedy search algorithm to accurately compute the estimator, leading to a computationally tractable omnibus test for the global null hypothesis that there are no linear relationships between any subsets of variables having the prespecified cardinality. We further develop a confidence interval that takes the variable selection into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian W McKeague & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Significance testing for canonical correlation analysis in high dimensions [Inconsistency of the bootstrap when a parameter is on the boundary of the parameter space]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(4), pages 1067-1083.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:109:y:2022:i:4:p:1067-1083.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asab059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:109:y:2022:i:4:p:1067-1083.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.