IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v108y2021i4p981-988..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bagging cross-validated bandwidths with application to big data
[baggedcv: Bagged cross-validation for kernel density bandwidth selection]

Author

Listed:
  • D Barreiro-Ures
  • R Cao
  • M Francisco-Fernández
  • J D Hart

Abstract

SummaryHall & Robinson (2009) proposed and analysed the use of bagged cross-validation to choose the bandwidth of a kernel density estimator. They established that bagging greatly reduces the noise inherent in ordinary cross-validation, and hence leads to a more efficient bandwidth selector. The asymptotic theory of Hall & Robinson (2009) assumes that , the number of bagged subsamples, is . We expand upon their theoretical results by allowingto be finite, as it is in practice. Our results indicate an important difference in the rate of convergence of the bagged cross-validation bandwidth for the casesand . Simulations quantify the improvement in statistical efficiency and computational speed that can result from using bagged cross-validation as opposed to a binned implementation of ordinary cross-validation. The performance of the bagged bandwidth is also illustrated on a real, very large, dataset. Finally, a byproduct of our study is the correction of errors appearing in the Hall & Robinson (2009) expression for the asymptotic mean squared error of the bagging selector.

Suggested Citation

  • D Barreiro-Ures & R Cao & M Francisco-Fernández & J D Hart, 2021. "Bagging cross-validated bandwidths with application to big data [baggedcv: Bagged cross-validation for kernel density bandwidth selection]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 108(4), pages 981-988.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:4:p:981-988.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaa092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:4:p:981-988.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.