IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v108y2021i4p895-913..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bio-equivalence tests in functional data by maximum deviation
[On the prediction of stationary functional time series]

Author

Listed:
  • Holger Dette
  • Kevin Kokot

Abstract

SummaryWe study the problem of testing equivalence of functional parameters, such as the mean or the variance function, in the two-sample functional data setting. In contrast to previous work where the functional problem is reduced to a multiple testing problem for the equivalence of scalar data by comparing the functions at each point, our approach is based on an estimate of a distance measuring the maximum deviation between the two functional parameters. Equivalence is claimed if the estimate for the maximum deviation does not exceed a given threshold. We propose a bootstrap procedure for obtaining quantiles of the distribution of the test statistic, and we prove consistency of the corresponding test in the large-sample scenario. As the methods proposed here avoid the use of the intersection-union principle, they are less conservative and more powerful than currently available approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot, 2021. "Bio-equivalence tests in functional data by maximum deviation [On the prediction of stationary functional time series]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 108(4), pages 895-913.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:4:p:895-913.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaa096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:4:p:895-913.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.