IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v103y2016i2p435-446..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile-based classifiers

Author

Listed:
  • C. Hennig
  • C. Viroli

Abstract

Classification with small samples of high-dimensional data is important in many application areas. Quantile classifiers are distance-based classifiers that require a single parameter, regardless of the dimension, and classify observations according to a sum of weighted componentwise distances of the components of an observation to the within-class quantiles. An optimal percentage for the quantiles can be chosen by minimizing the misclassification error in the training sample. It is shown that this choice is consistent for the classification rule with the asymptotically optimal quantile and that under some assumptions, as the number of variables goes to infinity, the probability of correct classification converges to unity. The effect of skewness of the distributions of the predictor variables is discussed. The optimal quantile classifier gives low misclassification rates in a comprehensive simulation study and in a real-data application.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Hennig & C. Viroli, 2016. "Quantile-based classifiers," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(2), pages 435-446.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:2:p:435-446.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asw015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Yuanhao & McLeod, Ian, 2020. "Ensemble quantile classifier," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Timothy I. Cannings & Richard J. Samworth, 2017. "Random-projection ensemble classification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 959-1035, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:2:p:435-446.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.