IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v101y2014i3p599-612..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of the likelihood continual reassessment method

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Jia
  • Shing M. Lee
  • Ying Kuen Cheung

Abstract

This paper deals with the design of the likelihood continual reassessment method, which is an increasingly widely used model-based method for dose-finding studies. It is common to implement the method in a two-stage approach, whereby the model-based stage is activated after an initial sequence of patients has been treated. While this two-stage approach is practically appealing, it lacks a theoretical framework, and it is often unclear how the design components should be specified. This paper develops a general framework based on the coherence principle, from which we derive a design calibration process. A real clinical-trial example is used to demonstrate that the proposed process can be implemented in a timely and reproducible manner, while offering competitive operating characteristics. We explore the operating characteristics of different models within this framework and show the performance to be insensitive to the choice of dose-toxicity model.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Jia & Shing M. Lee & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2014. "Characterization of the likelihood continual reassessment method," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(3), pages 599-612.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:101:y:2014:i:3:p:599-612.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asu012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:101:y:2014:i:3:p:599-612.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.