IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v37y2026i2parag003..html

Ecological and behavioral determinants of sex-biased predation of katydid prey by a bat predator

Author

Listed:
  • Kasturi Saha
  • Rohini Balakrishnan

Abstract

Sexual selection theory predicts that males are more likely than females to invest in costly mate-finding behaviors. In species that use acoustic signaling and searching by walking or flight for mate-finding, predation risk constitutes an important cost imposed on signalers and searchers. We tested the relative predation costs associated with mate finding for males and females in the katydid genus Mecopoda. To achieve this, we took an integrated approach. First, we examined sex-biased predation in the wild. Second, we experimentally tested the sex-specific predation risk of different mate-finding behaviors. Third, we quantified the frequency with which risky behaviors are performed in the wild. Males experienced higher predation than females during the breeding season by their bat predator Megaderma spasma, a pattern not explained by sex ratios, indicating male-biased predation. Enclosure experiments and field observations showed that males frequently engaged in high-risk behaviors, particularly calling and flight. Although flight was equally risky for both sexes, its rarity in females reduced their exposure. These results demonstrate that male Mecopoda spp. adopt a high-risk call-and-fly mate-finding strategy, incurring greater predation costs than females.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasturi Saha & Rohini Balakrishnan, 2026. "Ecological and behavioral determinants of sex-biased predation of katydid prey by a bat predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(2), pages 1-003..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:arag003.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arag003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:arag003.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.