IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v37y2026i2paraf158..html

Replication studies: a win-win for early-career training and behavioral ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Kate L Laskowski
  • Rose E O’Dea
  • Joel Pick

Abstract

As a community of researchers, behavioral ecologists work on a staggering diversity of animal systems and questions. Our goal is to build a series of generalizable hypotheses that can explain how and why animals do the things they do. But in order to fully delineate the boundaries and limitations of our hypotheses we need to replicate more. Most researchers generally agree that proper replication is necessary to ensure a firm foundation for our work, but lament that these studies can be hard to fund and even harder to publish. Here, we present a potential way forward: incorporating replication studies as part of standard research training for undergraduates and starting graduate students. We outline how these replication studies can be a positive pedagogical tool, providing training in research design, analysis and interpretation for early career researchers. Then we also introduce a new section of this journal, Replication Studies, which will publish close replications in short-format. Publishing more replication studies will shore up the foundations of our research and allow future evidence syntheses to uncover general patterns of animal behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate L Laskowski & Rose E O’Dea & Joel Pick, 2026. "Replication studies: a win-win for early-career training and behavioral ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(2), pages 158.-158..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:araf158.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:araf158.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.