IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v37y2026i2paraf149..html

The oviposition of unfertilized eggs depends on the presence of potential mates in a kissing bug

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Divito
  • Lorena Pompilio
  • Gabriel Manrique

Abstract

In most species, females face the risk of losing their oocytes if they remain unmated for a prolonged period. However, it remains unclear whether they have developed mechanisms to prevent the loss of fertilizable eggs according to the chances of finding a mate. We predict that virgin females will lay a lower proportion of their produced eggs when they perceive the presence of a male conspecific. We tested this prediction in the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus, comparing the oviposition of virgin females randomly exposed to the presence of a potential mate or isolation over 10 d. We found that isolated females laid 3 times as many eggs as females exposed to the presence of a male. The dissection of females showed that both groups produced similar numbers of developed eggs, suggesting that differences in oviposition are due to changes in egg retention, rather than on egg production. We discuss the possible benefits of egg retention in virgin females, and how this process may contribute to their reproductive decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Divito & Lorena Pompilio & Gabriel Manrique, 2026. "The oviposition of unfertilized eggs depends on the presence of potential mates in a kissing bug," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(2), pages 149.-149..
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:araf149.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf149
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:araf149.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.