IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v37y2026i1paraf147..html

Territoriality, sociality and male weaponry shape horn investment in female bovids

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Lopez
  • Theodore Stankowich

Abstract

Male weaponry is well understood and widely studied across taxa, yet female weaponry remains comparatively overlooked and the evolutionary drivers of such traits in females are still not well defined. In Bovidae, males typically use horns in sexual contests, but females show considerable variation in horn presence and size across species. Earlier research suggested female horns may function in intraspecific competition for territory or social rank, or serve as antipredator defense in exposed habitats, however, these studies did not directly test how socio-ecological factors shape variation in female horn length. In our study, we reevaluated the influence of socio-ecological factors on horn presence and rigorously tested their effects on female weapon investment (FWQ). Across family-level comparative analyses (N = 115), female territoriality, sociality, and body mass positively predicted horn presence. Among horned females (N = 80), horn investment differed among tribes and increased with sociality. Female horns did not scale with body mass and territorial and pair-bonded species—such as klipspringers and duikers—tended to have relatively shorter horns. Although male horn investment did not directly predict whether females bore horns, in species where females did, their horn investment scaled positively with that of males. Our results support female horn presence is primarily shaped by intraspecific competition and offset by cost-minimization at larger-bodied species, while providing new evidence that social selection influences female weapon investment in mammals.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Lopez & Theodore Stankowich, 2026. "Territoriality, sociality and male weaponry shape horn investment in female bovids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(1), pages 147.-147..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf147.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf147.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.