Author
Listed:
- Troy A Baird
- Joshua R York
Abstract
We combined behavioral and genetic parentage data recorded over a decade to test the causes and fitness consequences of some first-year males defending breeding territories whereas others delayed defense until Year-2. Ours was an interesting study population because individuals displayed long-term philopatry to habitat patches differing in structural features that influenced the success of breeding tactics. Territorial longevity was under strong selection that enhanced lifetime male fitness. Among males that survived to a second breeding season, Year-1 fitness was a strong predictor of lifetime fitness, and individuals that defended territories during Year-1 achieved higher first season fitness than those postponing defense. Nonetheless, the proportion of non-territorial first-year males remained relatively stable, suggesting that more than one social ontogeny is maintained in this population. Variation in habitat structural complexity appeared to play a key role in the maintenance of delayed territory defense. Surreptitious travel and mating via the network of sub-surface crawlspaces characterizing complex habitats allowed non-territorial males to achieve higher lifetime reproductive success than their counterparts in simple habitats lacking such interconnected crawlspaces. More frequent territory acquisition by larger first-year males, most of which hatched from first clutches, suggested that first-year territory acquisition was driven by the robust physiological condition, perhaps stemming from the increased time to forage and grow experienced by these males prior to their first spring breeding season. Our results demonstrate that combining lifetime genetic parentage with behavioral data on individuals is a powerful paradigm for investigating variation in individual behavior and social system evolution.
Suggested Citation
Troy A Baird & Joshua R York, 2026.
"Causes and consequences of lifetime fitness variation in male Collared Lizards displaying alternative social ontogenies,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(1), pages 140.-140..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf140.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf140.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.