IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v37y2026i1paraf137..html

Defensive coloration is not a reliable indicator of fungal infection in aposematic poison frogs

Author

Listed:
  • Lia Schlippe Justicia
  • Carolin Dittrich
  • Ossi Nokelainen
  • Bibiana Rojas

Abstract

The expression of visual signals such as coloration can be altered by parasitic or pathogenic infections through multiple pathways, including resource reallocation, impaired tissue structure, and reduced pigment acquisition. These effects may compromise the functions of coloration and overall fitness. Conversely, the link between pigments and immunological defences can aid differently colored individuals in coping with infection. While the pigmentation-condition association has been widely studied in the context of sexual selection, far less is known about how pathogens affect defensive coloration, such as aposematic signals. Here, we investigated whether infection by the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is reflected in characteristics of the melanin- and/or carotenoid-based coloration of the aposematic poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius in the wild. Using ddPCR to identify the frogs' infection status, and multispectral digital imaging to quantify their coloration traits, we show that neither type of coloration is a reliable indicator of Bd infection. Instead, body size influenced both infection outcomes and coloration, with sex-specific patterns suggesting potential ontogenetic or life-history trade-offs. Our findings highlight that the links between color expression and condition are more context- and taxa-dependent than often assumed, and suggest that, in D. tinctorius, defensive signals may remain stable despite pathogen exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Lia Schlippe Justicia & Carolin Dittrich & Ossi Nokelainen & Bibiana Rojas, 2026. "Defensive coloration is not a reliable indicator of fungal infection in aposematic poison frogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(1), pages 137.-137..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf137.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf137.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.