Author
Listed:
- Nicolas J Silva
- Liliana R Silva
- Pietro B D’Amelio
- André C Ferreira
- Annick Lucas
- Rita Covas
- Claire Doutrelant
Abstract
The association between dominance and phenotypic traits (“badges of status”) has been recently questioned, since it has been found to show more variation across populations and time than expected. Using an eleven-year dataset, encompassing more than 1,800 individuals, we studied the association between the size of a melanin-based plumage trait (a black patch under the beak or “bib”), individual attributes (age and sex) and dominance. Our study model, the sociable weaver (Philetairus socius), is a small passerine, which lives year-round in colonies of varying size. Bib sizes were obtained from pictures and automatically pre-processed with an object segmentation deep learning network. We recorded 36,346 dominance-related interactions to estimate dominance hierarchies. We then investigated the effect of sex and age on bib size, and the overall and between-year association of bib size and age with dominance for each sex. We found that bib size increased with age within individuals of both sexes. Age was a strong and consistent predictor of dominance in males, but not in females. Nevertheless, dominance was not correlated with bib size in males and in females. Finally, these relationships did not strongly vary between years. Our results suggest that males and females may use different factors to regulate dominance interactions. Furthermore, our longitudinal dataset allowed us to show that bib size is not a badge of status in our population even though its growth encodes information on age. These results highlight the importance of considering multiple traits over time when studying morphological signaling of dominance hierarchy.
Suggested Citation
Nicolas J Silva & Liliana R Silva & Pietro B D’Amelio & André C Ferreira & Annick Lucas & Rita Covas & Claire Doutrelant, 2026.
"Long-term evaluation of the association between dominance, bib size, sex and age,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 37(1), pages 135.-135..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf135.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:araf135.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.