IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v36y2025i6paraf138.html

Full compensation of parental care after partner loss in an annelid

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Kauffmann
  • Lula Insel
  • Maria Cristina Lorenzi

Abstract

In species with biparental care, each parent should theoretically benefit by exploiting its partner and reduce its investment in offspring care. The conflict is especially apparent when one parent deserts or reduces its investment, forcing the remaining parent to either abandon the brood or compensate for the loss of partner-care effort. However, compensation is expected to be partial for the evolutionary stability of biparental care. We investigated the level of care compensation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic annelid worm, Ophryotrocha diadema, where both parents care for egg clutches. We removed one parent and found that widowed parents fully compensated for the loss of their partner as the number of scan observations widows spent in clutch attendance was statistically equivalent to that of paired parents. Consistently, individually, widowed parents attended their clutch significantly more often than focal worms among paired parents. We discuss how full compensation can be compatible with the evolutionary stability of biparental care even in a system where the cost and benefit functions are theoretically the same for both parents, as most models assume. This species is rare, has sparse populations and its adaptations suggest that finding a partner is challenging. In this condition, nests might function as meeting points and nest attendance might promote mate encounters, thus mitigating the conflict of interests over parental care.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Kauffmann & Lula Insel & Maria Cristina Lorenzi, 2025. "Full compensation of parental care after partner loss in an annelid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(6), pages 138-138.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:6:p:araf138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:6:p:araf138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.