Author
Listed:
- Monika Ostap-Chec
- Weronika Antoł
- Daniel Bajorek
- Daniel Stec
- Krzysztof Miler
Abstract
Parasitic infections often alter host behavior, including foraging and the consumption of bioactive substances. In honeybees (Apis mellifera), infection with the common gut parasite Nosema ceranae causes metabolic disruption and increased mortality. Ethanol is a naturally occurring bioactive compound found in nectar, and honeybees exhibit high tolerance and resilience to chronic exposure. However, whether honeybees actively use ethanol during infection remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether N. ceranae-infected honeybees alter their ethanol consumption. In a feeding experiment, infected and uninfected honeybees were given a choice between plain sucrose solution and ethanol-spiked food (0.5% or 1% ethanol). We measured food consumption, survival, and spore load. Although overall food intake did not differ between groups, infected honeybees consumed a significantly higher proportion of ethanol-spiked food. Survival analysis showed that a diet containing 1% ethanol caused higher mortality than a diet containing 0.5% ethanol; however, among honeybees on a 1% ethanol diet, this negative effect was less pronounced in infected individuals than in controls. Spore load did not differ between treatments. These results suggest that N. ceranae infection induces a shift in feeding behavior toward increased ethanol intake, which may benefit infected honeybees by reducing mortality. This may reflect a self-medication response, although alternative explanations remain possible. Further research into ethanol's effects on Nosema spores is needed. Nonetheless, our findings provide insights into honeybee interactions with bioactive compounds and suggest that ethanol may be a behaviorally relevant dietary substance.
Suggested Citation
Monika Ostap-Chec & Weronika Antoł & Daniel Bajorek & Daniel Stec & Krzysztof Miler, 2025.
"Honeybees show an increased preference for dietary alcohol when parasitized,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(6), pages 121.-121..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:6:p:araf121.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:6:p:araf121.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.