Author
Listed:
- Yvonne Wang
- Devi Stuart-Fox
- Patricia Henríquez-Piskulich
- Amanda M Franklin
Abstract
When moving, animals are vulnerable to predation because movement can rapidly attract the attention of a predator. To reduce the risk of predation while moving, animals can use a variety of different strategies (eg erratic movement, coloration). These strategies often work in combination or may be influenced by other prey characteristics (eg size), but few studies have explored these interactions. Here, we investigate how movement trajectory (linear or erratic), prey size (small or large) and prey coloration (glossy or matte) interact to impact the attack behavior of giant rainforest mantids (Hierodula majuscula). We presented mantids with animations of moving targets and filmed their response with a high-speed camera. As expected, mantids were more likely to track large than small targets and targets moving linearly than erratically. Counterintuitively, however, mantids were quicker to strike at erratically moving targets, perhaps because they more closely resembled preferred prey. When mantids attacked the target, their accuracy was influenced by the interaction of target trajectory and glossiness. As predicted, mantids had larger attack errors (ie lower accuracy) toward erratically moving glossy targets compared with linearly moving glossy targets or erratically moving matte targets. However, contrary to our prediction that linearly moving matte targets would be easiest to capture, these targets also elicited large attack errors, similar to those recorded for erratically moving glossy targets. Together, our results demonstrate that anti-predator tactics for prey in motion may interact in complex ways, and simple experimental scenarios may overlook context-dependent effects that emerge when multiple factors interact.
Suggested Citation
Yvonne Wang & Devi Stuart-Fox & Patricia Henríquez-Piskulich & Amanda M Franklin, 2025.
"Prey movement, size, and glossiness interact to impact praying mantid attack behaviors,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(5), pages 107.-107..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf107.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.