IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v36y2025i5paraf100..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The last of us: social information enhances trappability in fruit flies

Author

Listed:
  • L Pollack
  • K Afework
  • J B Saltz

Abstract

When facing novel conditions, animals must make decisions crucial to survival with little precedence. Such decisions are not made in isolation: animals collect information by observing conspecifics, suggesting that social information may modify the population-level impact of shifting environmental conditions. We tested the competing hypotheses that social information could help or hinder animals to avoid an evolutionary trap, a phenomenon often created by anthropogenic modification. By manipulating the magnitude of a social cue, we examined how the number of already-drowned conspecifics influenced fruit flies' (Drosophila melanogaster) responses to vinegar traps. We found that flies were faster to drown in traps with more conspecifics, supporting the hypothesis that social information can facilitate maladaptive decisions. Moreover, sex and prior mating experience drove variation in this response: mated females had higher survival probabilities compared to unmated females and males. This work highlights how anthropogenic change can shift the fitness benefits of social information reliance, potentially making evolutionary traps even deadlier.

Suggested Citation

  • L Pollack & K Afework & J B Saltz, 2025. "The last of us: social information enhances trappability in fruit flies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(5), pages 100.-100..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf100.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf100.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.