Author
Listed:
- Renjie Zhang
- Nathan W Bailey
Abstract
Alternative reproductive phenotypes involve polymorphic behaviors and forms within sexes. Testing whether behavioral variants such as alternative tactics (eg sneaking or satellite behavior) are initially co-expressed or decoupled from morphological polymorphisms (eg weapon size or color pattern) can provide insight into the origins of reproductive diversity. In Hawaiian field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus), an eavesdropping parasitoid fly selected for rapid, parallel evolution of male wing mutations that reduce acoustic signals. Two of these, “flatwing” and “curly-wing”, co-occur in populations alongside ancestral “normal-wing” males that can sing. These convergent alternative morphs may both rely on satellite tactics in which nonsinging males position themselves near calling males to intercept females, rather than attracting mates directly by producing a conspicuous song. Here, we test whether flatwing and curly-wing vary in their tendencies to express satellite behavior using playback experiments with virgin, unmanipulated males simulating natural conditions. Surprisingly, flatwing males were significantly less likely to behave as satellites than normal-wing or curly-wing males. Normal-wing males with poorer body condition were more likely to behave as satellites, consistent with theory and previous findings, but the reduced-sound morphs showed no such condition dependence. Our findings suggest that morph-specific variation in the tendency to adopt satellite behavior may contribute to the maintenance of convergent male reproductive morphs; future work would benefit from testing whether such variation is driven by acoustic self-assessment. A decoupled relationship between behavioral reproductive tactics and morphological reproductive strategies may promote diversification of alternative mating morphs in nature.
Suggested Citation
Renjie Zhang & Nathan W Bailey, 2025.
"Divergent alternative mating tactics in convergent male reproductive morphs,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(5), pages 1-086..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf086.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:5:p:araf086.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.