Author
Listed:
- Claire E Nemes
- Andrea M Lindsay
- Lucas W DeGroote
- Emily B Cohen
Abstract
Migrating birds face competing pressures to travel as quickly and efficiently as possible while minimizing the risk of predation en route. Despite the potential importance, antipredator behaviors in migrating songbirds have been little studied relative to time and energy tradeoffs, even as humans have introduced novel predators including free-roaming domestic cats (Felis catus) across the globe. Birds confronted with predators during stopover can employ antipredator behaviors to reduce their immediate mortality risk, but doing so may slow refueling or impose other costs that influence migration. We captured migrating Gray Catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis) and exposed them to either a live cat, model hawk, or non-predator control in an aviary experiment to assess their behavioral responses. Birds moved lower after exposure to a model hawk but showed no significant behavioral changes in response to a cat, though we observed substantial individual variation in responses. After release, we monitored activity levels of a subset of tagged individuals via the Motus Wildlife Telemetry System. Post-release activity level did not differ between treatment and control groups, indicating that brief predator exposure did not exert a persistent effect on this behavior. The lack of overall responses to the cat may reflect birds navigating the tradeoff between antipredator behaviors, which are costly during migration, and reduction of predation risk. However, it could also indicate naïveté of young birds to this introduced predator, which may increase vulnerability to predation during migration. We encourage further investigation of the influence of prolonged or repeated exposure to domestic cats on songbird behavior and physiology, and ultimately migration success.
Suggested Citation
Claire E Nemes & Andrea M Lindsay & Lucas W DeGroote & Emily B Cohen, 2025.
"Close encounters: behavioral responses of migrating songbirds to the perceived risk of predation,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(3), pages 01555-01523.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:e01555-23.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:e01555-23.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.