Author
Listed:
- Ulrike Scherer
- Petri T Niemelä
- Wiebke Schuett
Abstract
Here, we explored a hypothesis from a framework proposing that sexual selection plays a role in shaping and maintaining consistent among-individual behavioral variation, commonly referred to as personality differences. This framework suggests that parental care may be a mechanism linking personality differences with reproductive fitness. To test this hypothesis, we repeatedly measured boldness as activity under simulated predation risk in male and female rainbow kribs, Pelvicachromis pulcher, a bi-parental West African cichlid. We then formed breeding pairs with varying degrees of behavioral contrast in boldness, recorded parental care (parental activity under risk and brood guarding) for both parents, and assessed key reproductive outcomes: the likelihood to reproduce, clutch size, offspring survival, and offspring size at the end of breeding. We observed consistent among-individual variation in all three behaviors. Males with higher pre-breeding activity under risk were less likely to reproduce. However, when these males did breed successfully, they achieved higher offspring survival rates compared to their less active counterparts. This relationship was mediated by parental care: males with higher pre-breeding activity under risk spent more time guarding their brood, and increased brood guarding was associated with higher offspring survival. Female pre-breeding activity under risk was not associated with parental care or reproductive success. These results suggest that male, but not female boldness might be subject to sexual selection. The observed pattern of bold males siring fewer but larger broods than less bold males could maintain among-individual variation in male boldness if it results in equal average fitness (eg due to environmental heterogeneity).
Suggested Citation
Ulrike Scherer & Petri T Niemelä & Wiebke Schuett, 2025.
"Male activity under risk predicts paternal care and reproductive success in a bi-parental cichlid,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 36(3), pages 502-508.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:502-508.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:502-508.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.