IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i1p417-423..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth

Author

Listed:
  • Liisa Hämäläinen
  • Georgina E Binns
  • Nathan S Hart
  • Johanna Mappes
  • Paul G Mc
  • Louis G O’Neill
  • Hannah M Rowland
  • Kate D L Umbers
  • Marie E Herberstein

Abstract

Aposematic prey advertise their unprofitability with conspicuous warning signals that are often composed of multiple color patterns. Many species show intraspecific variation in these patterns even though selection is expected to favor invariable warning signals that enhance predator learning. However, if predators acquire avoidance to specific signal components, this might relax selection on other aposematic traits and explain variability. Here, we investigated this idea in the aposematic moth Amata nigriceps that has conspicuous black and orange coloration. The size of the orange spots in the wings is highly variable between individuals, whereas the number and width of orange abdominal stripes remains consistent. We produced artificial moths that varied in the proportion of orange in the wings or the presence of abdominal stripes. We presented these to a natural avian predator, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala), and recorded how different warning signal components influenced their attack decisions. When moth models had orange stripes on the abdomen, birds did not discriminate between different wing signals. However, when the stripes on the abdomen were removed, birds chose the model with smaller wing spots. In addition, we found that birds were more likely to attack moths with a smaller number of abdominal stripes. Together, our results suggest that bird predators primarily pay attention to the abdominal stripes of A. nigriceps, and this could relax selection on wing coloration. Our study highlights the importance of considering individual warning signal components if we are to understand how predation shapes selection on prey warning coloration.

Suggested Citation

  • Liisa Hämäläinen & Georgina E Binns & Nathan S Hart & Johanna Mappes & Paul G Mc & Louis G O’Neill & Hannah M Rowland & Kate D L Umbers & Marie E Herberstein, 2024. "Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(1), pages 417-423.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:417-423.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:417-423.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.