IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v34y2023i4p593-601..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female foraging strategy co-evolves with sexual harassment intensity in the Trinidadian guppy

Author

Listed:
  • Yusan Yang
  • Eleanor Grant
  • Andrés López-Sepulcre
  • Swanne P Gordon

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a widespread evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict over mating rates. Male harassment can impose costs on females, and females often change their behaviors to avoid unwanted attention. In Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), males use either sneak mating behavior or courtship displays as reproductive tactics. Both behaviors can be sources of sexual harassment, but sneak behavior is likely more harmful. Males adapted to low-predation habitats use more courtship and fewer sneak tactics than their high-predation ancestors. Here, we tested whether female foraging strategy co-evolves with less severe male harassment as guppies colonize low-predation environments. We set up outdoor stream mesocosms with common-garden-reared males and females from either a high- or a low-predation population in a 2 × 2 design, and tested whether populations diverge in female response to male harassment. We found that both sneak behavior and courtship display reduced female foraging, but the effect of sneak behavior was more extensive. Furthermore, the negative effect of sneak behavior was more pronounced on high-predation females. Our results suggest that female foraging strategy coevolved with divergence in male mating strategy: females under more severe sexual harassment evolved a foraging strategy that is more sensitive to varying harassment levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusan Yang & Eleanor Grant & Andrés López-Sepulcre & Swanne P Gordon, 2023. "Female foraging strategy co-evolves with sexual harassment intensity in the Trinidadian guppy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 593-601.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:593-601.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:593-601.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.