IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v34y2023i3p506-513..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mating assortment and the strength of sexual selection in a polyandrous population of Cook Strait giant weta

Author

Listed:
  • Clint D Kelly
  • Darryl T Gwynne

Abstract

Polyandry can profoundly affect the strength of pre-copulatory sexual selection acting on males because each additional mate acquired by a female means that, all else being equal, a male’s paternity share declines. However, accruing additional mates could benefit male fitness if males with greater mating success also tend to have less promiscuous females as partners. If this is indeed the case, then males should experience strong sexual selection to acquire more mates. We tested these predictions by collecting detailed mating data on male and female Cook Strait giant weta (Deinacrida rugosa) in the wild via daily radio tracking. Our sexual network-based approach indeed revealed that the most polygynous male D. rugosa mated the least polyandrous females. This finding therefore suggests that the most successful males likely face lower intensities of sperm competition and so should be selected to accrue more mates. Further, our selection analysis revealed significant pre-copulatory sexual selection on males with those having relatively smaller body size, lighter body mass, and longer legs accruing more mates than otherwise. Thus, it appears that both pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection reinforce the same male phenotype.

Suggested Citation

  • Clint D Kelly & Darryl T Gwynne, 2023. "Mating assortment and the strength of sexual selection in a polyandrous population of Cook Strait giant weta," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 506-513.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:506-513.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:506-513.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.