IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i4p698-704..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individuals with larger head volume have better learning ability in wild chestnut thrushes

Author

Listed:
  • Yingqiang Lou
  • Yuqi Zou
  • Yun Fang
  • Jon E Swenson
  • Anders Pape Møller
  • Yuehua Sun

Abstract

Recent comparative studies on fish and mammals have suggested that brain size is associated with cognitive ability, such as problem solving and self-control; larger-brained individuals are assumed to have better cognitive ability. However, it remains largely unexplored whether larger-brained birds perform better in learning and spatial memory tests. Here, we used two experiments (novel skill learning task and spatial memory task) to examine whether head volume (proxy for brain size) could predict the learning performance and spatial performance in wild chestnut thrushes (Turdus rubrocanus). First, we found that chestnut thrushes with larger head volume were more likely to learn the novel skill than individuals with smaller head volume. Second, individuals with larger head volume relative to their tarsus (relative head volume) learned the novel skill faster. Age, sex, and exploratory tendency of individuals were not related to learning performance or learning speed. Finally, head volume, relative head volume and age was not associated with spatial performance in the spatial memory tasks. Together, these findings provided empirical evidences for the relationship between head volume and the ability of novel skill learning, and also provide a non-invasive method for studying the relationship between cognitive ability and head volume in other bird species.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingqiang Lou & Yuqi Zou & Yun Fang & Jon E Swenson & Anders Pape Møller & Yuehua Sun, 2022. "Individuals with larger head volume have better learning ability in wild chestnut thrushes," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 698-704.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:698-704.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:698-704.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.