IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i4p688-697..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider

Author

Listed:
  • Lenka Sentenská
  • Catherine Scott
  • Pierick Mouginot
  • Maydianne C B Andrade

Abstract

Understanding factors affecting male mate choice can be important for tracking the dynamics of sexual selection in nature. Male brown widow spiders (Latrodectus geometricus) mate with adult as well as immature (subadult) females. Mating with adults involves costly courtship with a repertoire of signaling behaviors, and typically ends with cannibalism (“self-sacrifice” initiated by male somersault). Mating with subadults involves brief courtship with behavioral repertoire reduced to one component (vibration) and no cannibalism. We examined male mate choice as a function of risks associated with different types of mates and the cues available to courting males. Previous studies showed male preference for adults based on air-borne pheromones, but it was unclear whether that preference is maintained after males reach female’s webs. We show that males prefer adults also based on silk-borne contact cues. To determine which types of cues trigger different courtship components, we swapped adults and subadults between webs. We showed that contact with adult females’ webs triggers two courtship behaviors from the repertoire, with adult female’s bodies triggering additional behaviors. However, vibrational signals occur regardless of the web origin or female developmental stage. We conclude that males recognize subadult females as potential mates, but are more likely to invest in costly courtship behaviors and mating attempts with adults. In our experiments, subadults were less likely to mate than adults. We conclude that mating with adults could be the preferred option for males because of the higher likelihood of copulation, even at the cost of a higher risk of cannibalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenka Sentenská & Catherine Scott & Pierick Mouginot & Maydianne C B Andrade, 2022. "Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 688-697.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:688-697.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hangkyo Lim & Michael D. Greenfield, 2007. "Female pheromonal chorusing in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 165-173, January.
    2. Shevy Waner & Uzi Motro & Yael Lubin & Ally R. Harari, 2018. "Male mate choice in a sexually cannibalistic widow spider," Discussion Paper Series dp713, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrea Gonzalez-Karlsson & Yftach Golov & Hadass Steinitz & Aviad Moncaz & Eyal Halon & Rami Horowitz & Inna Goldenberg & Roi Gurka & Alexander Liberzon & Victoria Soroker & Russell Jurenka & Ally R Ha, 2021. "Males perceive honest information from female released sex pheromone in a moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1127-1137.
    2. Maya Bar-Hillel & Cass R. Sunstein, 2019. "Baffling bathrooms: On navigability and choice architecture," Discussion Paper Series dp726, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:688-697.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.