IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p156-166..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crocodile social environments dictated by male philopatry
[Unifying spatial and social network analysis in disease ecology]

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron J Baker
  • Céline H Frère
  • Craig E Franklin
  • Hamish A Campbell
  • Terri R Irwin
  • Ross G Dwyer

Abstract

Examining the social behaviors of solitary species can be challenging due to the rarity in which interactions occur and the large and often inaccessible areas which these animals inhabit. As shared space-use is a prerequisite for the expression of social behaviors, we can gain insights into the social environments of solitary species by examining the degree of spatial overlap between individuals. Over a 10-year period, we examined how spatial overlap amongst 105 estuarine crocodiles Crocodylus porosus was influenced by season, sex, and movement tactic. We discovered that crocodiles displayed highly consistent spatial overlaps with conspecifics between months and across years. Furthermore, male crocodiles that exhibited a greater degree of site fidelity displayed more stable social environments, while females and males that were less site-attached had more dynamic social environments with spatial overlaps between conspecifics peaking during the mating season. Our results demonstrate how long-term tracking of multiple individuals within the same population can be used to quantify the spatial structure and social environment of cryptic and solitary species.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron J Baker & Céline H Frère & Craig E Franklin & Hamish A Campbell & Terri R Irwin & Ross G Dwyer, 2022. "Crocodile social environments dictated by male philopatry [Unifying spatial and social network analysis in disease ecology]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 156-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:156-166.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:156-166.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.