IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i5p1207-1217..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal predation risk increases offspring’s exploration but does not affect schooling behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Cattelan
  • James Herbert-Read
  • Paolo Panizzon
  • Alessandro Devigili
  • Matteo Griggio
  • Andrea Pilastro
  • Chiara Morosinotto
  • Colette St Mary

Abstract

The environment that parents experience can influence their reproductive output and their offspring’s fitness via parental effects. Perceived predation risk can affect both parent and offspring phenotype, but it remains unclear to what extent offspring behavioral traits are affected when the mother is exposed to predation risk. This is particularly unclear in live-bearing species where maternal effects could occur during embryogenesis. Here, using a half-sib design to control for paternal effects, we experimentally exposed females of a live-bearing fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), to visual predator cues and conspecific alarm cues during their gestation. Females exposed to predation risk cues increased their antipredator behaviors throughout the entire treatment. Offspring of mothers exposed to the predation stimuli exhibited more pronounced exploratory behavior, but did not show any significant differences in their schooling behavior, compared to controls. Thus, while maternally perceived risk affected offspring’s exploration during early stages of life, offspring’s schooling behavior could be influenced more by direct environmental experience rather than via maternal cues. Our results suggest a rather limited role in predator-induced maternal effects on the behavior of juvenile guppies.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Cattelan & James Herbert-Read & Paolo Panizzon & Alessandro Devigili & Matteo Griggio & Andrea Pilastro & Chiara Morosinotto & Colette St Mary, 2020. "Maternal predation risk increases offspring’s exploration but does not affect schooling behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(5), pages 1207-1217.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1207-1217.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1207-1217.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.