IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i6p1700-1706..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic D R Burns
  • Jon W Pitchford
  • Catherine L Parr
  • Daniel W Franks
  • Elva J H Robinson
  • Luke Holman

Abstract

A challenge faced by individuals and groups of many species is determining how resources and activities should be spatially distributed: centralized or decentralized. This distribution problem is hard to understand due to the many costs and benefits of each strategy in different settings. Ant colonies are faced by this problem and demonstrate two solutions: 1) centralizing resources in a single nest (monodomy) and 2) decentralizing by spreading resources across many nests (polydomy). Despite the possibilities for using this system to study the centralization/decentralization problem, the trade-offs associated with using either polydomy or monodomy are poorly understood due to a lack of empirical data and cohesive theory. Here, we present a dynamic network model of a population of ant nests which is based on observations of a facultatively polydomous ant species (Formica lugubris). We use the model to test several key hypotheses for costs and benefits of polydomy and monodomy and show that decentralization is advantageous when resource acquisition costs are high, nest size is limited, resources are clustered, and there is a risk of nest destruction, but centralization prevails when resource availability fluctuates and nest size is limited. Our model explains the phylogenetic and ecological diversity of polydomous ants, demonstrates several trade-offs of decentralization and centralization, and provides testable predictions for empirical work on ants and in other systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic D R Burns & Jon W Pitchford & Catherine L Parr & Daniel W Franks & Elva J H Robinson & Luke Holman, 2019. "The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1700-1706.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1700-1706.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Ellis & Daniel W. Franks & Elva J.H. Robinson, 2014. "Resource redistribution in polydomous ant nest networks: local or global?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1183-1191.
    2. Maurício Cantor & Lauren G. Shoemaker & Reniel B. Cabral & César O. Flores & Melinda Varga & Hal Whitehead, 2015. "Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather Williams & Andrew Scharf & Anna R. Ryba & D. Ryan Norris & Daniel J. Mennill & Amy E. M. Newman & Stéphanie M. Doucet & Julie C. Blackwood, 2022. "Cumulative cultural evolution and mechanisms for cultural selection in wild bird songs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Yi-Huei Chen & Elva J H Robinson, 2014. "The Relationship between Canopy Cover and Colony Size of the Wood Ant Formica lugubris - Implications for the Thermal Effects on a Keystone Ant Species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Gengjun Yao & Jingwei Wang & Baoguo Cui & Yunlong Ma, 2022. "Quantifying effects of tasks on group performance in social learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1700-1706.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.