IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i6p1624-1631..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Females of a cannibalistic spider control mutilation of their genitalia by males

Author

Listed:
  • Pierick Mouginot
  • Gabriele Uhl
  • Michael Taborsky

Abstract

When females can mate multiply, the interests of both sexes over female remating may not coincide, leading to selection for adaptations and counteradaptations in males and females. In several orb-weaving spiders, males damage external structures of the female genitalia during copulation, which hinders the female from remating. We investigated whether females have control over the mutilation of their genitalia in the orb-weaving spider Larinia jeskovi. We found that female sexual cannibalism during copulation reduced the number of insertions a male was able to perform and hence limited the probability of genital mutilation by the male. Genital mutilation did not differ between treatments in which females experienced different availabilities of other males before the mating trial: males absent, males near the female (“vicinity group”), and males in the female’s web (“web group”). However, traits of the mating male (size, condition) were significantly correlated with the occurrence of cannibalism during mating in “web” and “vicinity” treatments. These results suggest that females have control over mutilation by an early termination of mating, can respond to the availability of potential mates and can alter the probability of mutilation according to certain male traits. Female sexual cannibalism may represent a counteradaptation to genital mutilation allowing females to mate multiply.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierick Mouginot & Gabriele Uhl & Michael Taborsky, 2019. "Females of a cannibalistic spider control mutilation of their genitalia by males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1624-1631.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1624-1631.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1624-1631.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.