IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1477-1487..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food deprivation affects egg laying and maternal care but not offspring performance in a beetle

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Richardson
  • Jennifer Ross
  • Per T Smiseth
  • Marie Herberstein

Abstract

Individuals vary with respect to their nutritional state and such variation is an important determinant of the amount of resources individuals allocate toward reproductive functions. Currently, we have a relatively poor understanding of the downstream consequences of food deprivation on different traits associated with reproduction. Here, we address this gap by investigating how food deprivation affected different traits across the breeding cycle in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides; a species that breeds on carcasses of small vertebrates serving as food for both parents and offspring. We found that food-deprived females took longer to start egg laying than control females, which may allow them more time to feed from the carcass. There was no difference between food-deprived and control females in the number, size, laying pattern, or hatching success of eggs, suggesting that this delay allowed females to compensate for their poor initial state. However, food-deprived females spent less time providing care, suggesting that this compensation was incomplete. Finally, we found no evidence for negative effects of food deprivation on the offspring’s growth or survival, which is surprising given that food-deprived females took longer to initiate egg laying and provided less care to their offspring. Our results highlight that food deprivation can have complex effects on parental and offspring traits, and suggest that females face a trade-off between the benefits of mitigating downstream consequences of nutritional stress and the costs associated with delaying the start of reproduction. Starved burying beetle mothers delayed egg laying and provided less care. Yet, their offspring survived and grew just as well as offspring of control mothers. Burying beetles breed on carcasses that serve as food for both parents and offspring. Starved mothers spend more time feeding for themselves, which boosts their condition and opens the carcass, allowing offspring to self-feed. We show that the mother’s nutritional state can affect reproduction without costs to offspring.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Richardson & Jennifer Ross & Per T Smiseth & Marie Herberstein, 2019. "Food deprivation affects egg laying and maternal care but not offspring performance in a beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1477-1487.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1477-1487.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz104
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1477-1487.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.