IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1469-1476..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-deception in nonhuman animals: weak crayfish escalated aggression as if they were strong

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J AngillettaJr
  • Gregory Kubitz
  • Robbie S Wilson
  • John Quinn

Abstract

Humans routinely deceive themselves when communicating to others, but no one knows whether other animals do the same. We ask whether dishonest signaling between crayfish meets a condition required for self-deception: dishonest individuals and honest individuals escalate aggression according to their signals of strength rather than actual strength. Using game theory, we predicted how an animal’s knowledge of its strength should affect its decision to escalate aggression. At the evolutionary equilibrium, an animal that knows its strength should escalate aggression according to its strength, relative to the expected strength of its opponent. By contrast, an animal that knows only its size should escalate aggression according to its size, relative to the size of its opponent. We tested these predictions by staging encounters between male crayfish (Cherax dispar) of known sizes and strengths. Consistent with a model of self-deception, crayfish escalated aggression based on the sizes of their claws relative to those of their opponents, despite the fact that size poorly predicts strength. Males who were weak for their size escalated disputes less often, but their aggression far exceeded the level predicted by a model of self-awareness, suggesting these crayfish were largely ignorant of their deception. Animals that fail to recognize their own dishonest signals may win disputes with stronger opponents without engaging in costly combat. Our game-theoretical approach can be used to identify potential cases of self-deception in nonhuman animals, enabling comparative studies of this behavior. Humans routinely overestimate their ability to compete, but no one knows whether other animals engage in this type of self-deception. We used a mathematical model to predict the behavior of crayfish engaging in self-deception. Consistent with our model, weak crayfish behaved as aggressively as strong crayfish, suggesting that they fail to recognize their own strength. Individuals that overestimate their strength can scare away stronger opponents without a fight.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J AngillettaJr & Gregory Kubitz & Robbie S Wilson & John Quinn, 2019. "Self-deception in nonhuman animals: weak crayfish escalated aggression as if they were strong," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1469-1476.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1469-1476.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1469-1476.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.